ATI and NVIDIA fight each other for a long time, and many friends may think that ATI is a weak side and make unremitting efforts to achieve an equal footing now . However, the fact is not really. ATI is early than Nvidia for eight years, ATI, which was established in 1985, with a public company in 1993, its economic strength has been extremely strong. Compared NVIDIA, ATI in a public company, has just set up his talent, but does not have its own production plant, it is purely a chip design company, not its own production capacity. Contrast this, in terms of technology and investment as well as from the capital market share, both ATI occupies a very big advantage, and the NVIDIA in a variety of resources are stretched. Therefore, ATI is the real strong.
But why ATI will give us the "weak" impression? ATI worked with years in the OEM market and brand, and the individual not paid enough attention to the consumer market is inseparable from, which makes ATI and NVIDIA in 1997 is not much before the conflict, there have been no positive confrontation, because wwww.NVIDIA.com targeted market (NVIDIA main personal entertainment market) and ATI did not overlap. So, with NVIDIA in the personal consumer market superpower, the end of the market in the vast number of individual consumers, will result in a stronger ATI NVIDIA strength of the impression.
Said earlier, in 1997, ATI and NVIDIA is no more obvious positive conflict, but as the individual consumer market will grow rapidly, ATI has to re-examine its past is not optimistic about the personal consumer market. In this context, ATI has finally launched in 1997 good performance 3-D core Rage has been added to the retail market for. At that time, NVIDIA graphics market is not a monopoly situation, but there are more than 50 graphics design and manufacturer. At the time of course, is a thriving 3 DFX, their classic VooDoo2 card also is the year. Others, such as Matrox, NVIDIA, Renditiom, S3, 3Dlabs, ATI, Cirruslogic, Trident, Videologic, even Intel have joined the battle group. Comparing the old and some eligible players should also remember that their bar, huh. Overall 1997 graphics card market is a very confusing year, and this situation has been chaotic 2000 to be a fundamental change - NVIDIA beat all rivals to become the dominant card retail market.
Therefore, we have to understand between ATI and NVIDIA ex grudge and resentment, it is necessary to begin from 1997……
May 1997, ATI issued his strongest performance of the Rage Pro graphics chip, but the driver was very bad. Basically reached in the performance with NVIDIA common opponents - 3 DFX the VooDoo cards. But then almost all support VooDoo graphics, wearing the crown firmly in the heads of three DFX, ATI and NVIDIA only to the second and desperately.
3D Rage Pro production of 0.35 um, with a pipeline and a unit of Arts; core frequency of 75 MHz, 75 MTexels / s fill rate, 64-bit interface significantly, the type of SDR 100 MHz memory frequency, as well as poor 0.80 GB / s memory bandwidth, support was the latest DirectX 6.0.
April 1997 NVIDIA to their RIVA128 chip (code-named NV3) joined the ranks of competitors (August sale), which under DirectX significantly more than Voodoo. This is more than 640 × 480 pixel resolution, in particular the use of the texture Obviously, this is due RIVA wider memory bus and a built-in the DirectX compatibility.
RIVA128 was the first to support the AGP 1X interface (AGP (accelerated graphics Accelcrated Graphics Port Interface) bus width of 32 Bit, clock rate of 66 MHz and 133 MHz two, the biggest data transmission rates as high as 266 Mbps and 533 Mbps. To AGP main memory for frame buffer (Frame Buffer), texture data can be stored in them, thereby reducing memory consumption, realizing high-speed access, effectively solved the 3-D graphics processing bottlenecks) and the effect of nebulized (Fogging: atomization. color and background will be a mixed to hide background to achieve mist effect) products.
Support the hardware triangle formation, with the 128 - the two D/3D bit accelerated graphics core. Fill rate reached 100 Mpixel / s, the largest 4 MB SDRAM / SGRAM, similarly equipped with a rendering pipelines, and a unit of Arts.
In 1997 ATI and NVIDIA’s confrontation, the NVIDIA Riva 128 with 128-bit graphics core, the speed is obviously higher than ATI’s 3 D Rage Pro, but its quality is not D Rage Pro 3 so exquisite. So this round, with victories ATI and NVIDIA (In fact, the speed advantage advantage screen more than practical significance).
Time to enter in 1998, this year was the most competitive graphics market busy year, or graphics intensified market competition year. Graphics market this year, also started shuffling - NVDIA emerged, three of the Challenger DFX unprepared for the attack, the pace of R & D have a disorder, and ATI? This year is not as a number.
First take a look at May 1998 release of the first NVIDIA Riva TNT, which is in the most sensational 1998 card, because it is the prevailing one in the performance of the graphics VooDoo completely knocked out, this is by virtue of graphics, NVIDIA representatives established a high-performance 3-D graphics card’s image.
Riva TNT was released, with a host of new technologies, including core technology TwiN Texel engine, a two-megapixel 32 - bit rendering pipeline. The 32-bit pipelined allowed in a clock cycle can also handle two pixels; The other is 24 Z-Buffer (Z-Buffer is a 3-D objects dealing with the depth of information technology, its different objects and different parts of the same object of the current Z coordinates record, in color, for those in the other objects hidden behind the structure, so that they will not be displayed. Z Bufer used by the higher median will represent it can provide more accurate value of the depth of field) The eight templates, supports a wide range of graphics filters such as MIP textures per pixel imaging guarantee the clarity of the biggest supports 16 MB of memory, making new graphics chip in the image quality on a significant improvement in the handling of 3-D image quality also a substantial increase (to the 32-bit true color).
Now we look at NVIDIA TNT, as well as its rival ATI graphics card in October 1998 issued by the Rage 128 core. In fact, due to the release of Rage 128 hours late, he appeared on the market in time, the NVIDIA TNT2 has been issued, so that Rage 128 is outdated products, but because ATI in the entire October 1998 to 1999 In August, and there is no better product, Rage 128 has been insisting for nearly a year’s time才被his successor by the Rage 128 Pro GL alternative.
Rage 128 core specifically for the design and rendering 32, 32 rendering environment will only cause less than 5% of the performance loss, so many test its performance compared with the TNT2 also not very different, it has built-in MPEG2 decoding and dynamic compensation circuit can be smooth DVD playback. Rage128 is divided into GL and VR models, the main VR on the low-end and high-end GL. Rage128 GL is the first one fully supports OpenGL hardware on the chip. However, as time to market too late and the driver failed to issue it as TNT2 as for the whole world.
From a performance point of view, Rage 128 in the specifications, then to slightly higher than TNT, the performance is slightly higher than TNT. From the market point of view, the late release, along with its worst drivers, it did not become as mainstream as TNT. From this perspective, ATI lost in the 1998 NVIDIA. ATI To save the Rockets, only accelerate the speed of development, shorten the release cycle of new products can be overbearing in the NVIDIA momentum in the retail market under a firm footing. However, things are not we think this way? Let us enter the 1999……
1999, the card market is not an unusual year. In the past year, three DFX start toward its doom, NVIDIA begun to emerge; ATI finally catch up, keep up with the NVIDIA behind, and S3 far failed to keep pace with NVIDIA and 3 DFX pace of technological upgrading, are already sunset yellow flower, Matrox also beautiful only by virtue of its clear support 2-D picture of hard, and has been the NVIDIA TNT2 forced insufficient, and other graphics closure of the closure of the production, acquisition merger. 1999 after 2000, the chip market brands has been greatly reduced. All this, and the NVIDIA TNT2 graphics card has a very close relationship. But the good news is, ATI as a solid financial and technical strength as backing, the major reshuffle in 1999, and did not fall from ATI, although in 1999 the same throughout the year as not much.
Well, now back to the question. Let us look at this year ATI and NVDIA confrontation between the two core - RAGE 128 PRO GL and TNT2. First, we take a look at, first in RAGE 128 PRO core releases TNT2, this is NVIDIA for the resistance has become a trump card in March 1999 release.
TNT2 the core code-named NV5 In fact, this is only the improved version of TNT’s production from 0.35 to 0.25 um um change, the introduction of new technology, the core operating frequency is not a small increase, the standard version will be able to run on 125 MHz frequency, 32 MB of memory, 32-bit frame buffer support, and support DVI output interface, peak speed of 250 Mpixels / Sec. Even if it is only an improved version, but he left two months after the release of the VooDoo3 also eclipsed. In addition, it should be cheaper than many VooDoo3, TNT2 then become market-driven inevitable.
Then look at the April 1999 release of the RAGE 128 PRO core. From the name, we can also see from, RAGE RAGE 128 PRO is only improved version of the 128, only 128 RAGE enhanced on the basis of some properties, as well as improved operating frequency. But its size has been the same with the TNT2, such as the use of 0.25 um process, the working frequency is 125 MHz, pixel fill rate also reached 2.5 MTexels / s, the memory is still 128-bit wide. Rage Pro 128 and Rage 128 compared not only substantially increase the frequency of core and memory, and support for the heterosexual filtering, upgraded triangle generation engine performance than Rage 128 increase by nearly 50 per cent.
From a performance viewpoint, although RGAE 128 and TNT2 PRO with similar specifications, but in the speed of 3-D games still lag behind the TNT2. However, ATI in RGAE 128 PRO legacy ATI quality advantages in the video playback than TNT2 an edge. From this perspective, it should be well-matched in the two. However, it is the pursuit of speed much higher than that of the pursuit of quality. Therefore, from a market point of view, RAGE 128 PRO defeated by the TNT2, ATI and NVIDIA’s three previous confrontation have ended in failure.
In fact, in 1999 NVIDIA also set off a revolution in graphics display technology - GeForce256 release, but since it is the first time the concept of GPU, did not have any cards GeForce256 a core of advanced architecture, and so in 1999 No, a card can defeat it, but it also set off a new display technology revolution, it was only because of price reasons, the TNT2 is still the mainstream of the time. Perhaps many of my friends think that the ATI and NVIDIA fourth confrontation, will appear in the GeForce256 possession, but that is not the case, then, ATI and NVIDIA in the fourth confrontation in which the two chip? The answer, in the 2000……
NVIDIA, the new millennium is to establish the hegemony of the year status, but also to meet the challenges of 2001. Enter 2000, NV GeForce256 show its revolutionary core, knocked down a large graphics core design manufacturers, thereby establishing its graphics core of the dominant position in the market. This year, the core brand has been greatly reduced, only a few of the more well-known brand is the impact of the hard NVIDIA support (ATI exception).
3DFX go at this time, it is already a spent force, released VooDoo5 cards in the market do not survive long, and is the envy of the VooDoo5500 VooDoo 6000, as well as graphics or even appeared in the market. Matrox Although 3-D has been completely abandoned by the graphics market, but by virtue of its high-quality 2-D output, there are still a large number of industry users to its respected times, in 2000, Matrox is still difficult to maintain. Only ATI, with a strong financial and technical support, and still stick with.
NVIDIA since November 1999 issued a landmark GeForce256 graphics chip, because of its structure is a new graphics core, many manufacturers caught off guard by his play, it can be said there is no retaliate in force, since its release five months, no vendors have issued a threat to its core graphics. Until April 24, 2000, ATI’s Radeon256 (in fact, is what we usually Radeon) to release before the NVIDIA remove the crown of the king of performance. But, the good time on the core Radeon256 ATI released after 48 hours, that is, the same year on April 26, NVIDIA also announced its next-generation core - NV15, and officially named the GeForce2 GTS. ATI and NVIDIA This is the fourth confrontation.
For these two products, their specifications, as well as a very similar structure, and performance testing has shown the characteristics are very clear: GeForce2 GTS in 16 bit color mode to the test results generally higher than Radeon256. The Radeon in 32-bit color mode, test results are generally higher than the GeForce2 GTS. This is, we can from the following seen in test results.
Although they have a high performance low, but on the whole, the gap negligible in actual use, and they do not feel is basically out. Therefore, in this confrontation, ATI since 1997 and the first time since NVIDIA on the same starting line. NVIDIA performance also marked the first time the threat of great challenge. However, due to the operation of the market, such as price-driven procedures, as well as the reasons, Radeon256 ultimately did not win the majority of consumers recognized, ATI competition in the retail market is still a long way to go. Anyway, 2000 is ATI NVIDIA in the process of catching up with the most practical significance of the year, because they have proved their ability to transcend NVIDIA.
If I have reviewed this year between them who wins, then I will still be sentenced NVIDIA win because they insist every six months to conduct a graphics technology updates, according to its own rhythm introduced products, the operation of the market as a whole has done has been very successful, and its driver has done very well, N card compatibility and stability are excellent. From this perspective, again better than the ATI NVIDIA.
In 2001, most people sad happened, especially VooDoo fans, 3 DFX, in the middle of NVIDIA acquired by its rival, 3 DFX launched the stage of history, VooDoo cards also disappeared. 3DFX withdrawal will be the first time ATI and NVIDIA VS 1 to 1 in the form of market competition. (At this point the Matrox has no ability to compete with ATI and NVIDIA, S3 is almost to the end of history.)
1 VS 1 situation for ATI and NVIDIA, are good news. Only because they bear the pressure side, and not have to worry about the multi-faceted enemy. Nevertheless, ATI and NVIDIA between competition and thus did not slow, but more and more intense. NVIDIA pursued in the six months that is not on the cards for the first update technology strategy, ATI only in terms of time and NVIDIA competition, efforts to shorten the research and development cycle to ensure that their products are not in leaving behind NVIDIA.
It is precisely for this reason that graphics performance over the previous year and doubled. NVIDIA on February 22, 2001 issued their GeForce3 graphics core, and divided into GeForce3 Ti200 and GeForce3 Ti500. In fact, GeForce3 graphics core is Geforce2 improved version, strictly speaking, not a new generation of GeForce3 cards, because of its performance and a GeForce2 Ultra. In August 14, ATI announced their carefully designed Radeon 8500 core, performance and NIVIDIA once again tied the GeForce3 war.
This time, though still not exceed ATI NVIDIA, ATI’s reputation but because the GeForce3 worse and the rising cost, ATI’s share in the retail market is also growing, has been a serious threat to the NVIDIA hegemonic position needs a NVIDIA truly high-performance graphics cards to combat ATI. This time, ATI gain the victory……
2002, NVIDIA will use any weapon to regain lost positions? Please Read on to……
Is February, February 22, 2001 NVIDIA released a superficial change the transitional product GeForce3 graphics chips. Published GeForce3 with almost the same day - February 6, 2002 NVIDIA released its new generation of GPU graphics core GeForce4 family. There are three Titanium version (code-named NV25): GeForce4 Ti4200 set at 250/250 clock; Ti4400 for the 275/275, and 300/325 set GeForce4 Ti4600 under. In addition, three entry-level MX version (code-named NV17) based on the updated MX graphics chip performance is no less than 18 months before the release of the GeForce2 Ultra good. This is intended to be used to suppress NVDIA ATI’s "Lethal Weapon" Nevertheless, the unexpected NVIDIA, ATI is in the subsequent release of 9700 (the core code-named R300) series graphics, GeForce4 cards is a glory. Please…… or because we see a few test results, and it will clear.
Do little to note, the above three results were from a number of sites Evaluation Room, from the results of the different sites found that the results are basically the same, which avoid the man-made factors. From the map, we can easily see that R9700 card has been full of achievements ahead of the GeForce Ti4600. This NVIDIA, is a resounding slap in the face in mind, the dream of pumping from NVIDIA Peter.
ATI see the results so that more consumers have trusted their products, thus choose ATI graphics. As for the media in the year, ATI Radeon 9700, and they became the target of frequent commended. It can be said that 2002 is ATI came as a year. Along with the media and much praise, ATI’s share in the retail market expanding further, NVIDIA dominance of the situation of a complete break. This year, ATI is a turning point in the retail market, and since then, ATI’s brand enjoys popular support, and graphics sales in the retail market steady growth, ATI also This is the first year, on an equal footing with NVIDIA together to carve up the retail market.
ATI was bitten by a ruthless fashion, NVIDIA naturally will not concede defeat, therefore, in 2003, a new round of competition will be staged at……
In March 2003, in order to restore GF4 cards on the decline in performance, NVIDIA released the name of a next-generation FX graphics. NVIDIA FX series of cards is the fifth generation graphics in this generation of graphics performance is the most outstanding GeForce FX 5950Ultra, this card is actually in the 2003’s October release, has been from 2004 near, or from the sixth generation of NVIDIA cards issued has been close, but in any event, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950Ultra is the fifth generation of graphics in the top of the. However, the fact that GeForce FX 5950 Ultra graphics card is not very successful, first of all, but it is up to the price of 500 dollars, followed by the performance is that it can only be an equal and 9800 XT.
ATI again in 2003 to see the new move. In fact, the entire 2003 ATI in the busy rich product line things, in this year of 9 Series ATI graphics unprecedented wealth, from low-end to high-end 9100 XT 9800, the product line was significantly breakdown at the same time NVIDIA and the competition is becoming increasingly fierce. ATI in the course of the year should be representative of the 9800 XT, ATI graphics represent the highest level in the year, NVIDIA FX 5950Ultra because it is released while.
That being the case, we have to look at the performance of both the above comparison. In related sites to test, the majority of projects are undertaken by 9800 XT lead, only NVIDIA strengths - OpenGL performance test, leading to 9800 XT. Although the 9800 XT leading modest, but it also shows that the 9800 XT is a performance advantage. However, only a small advantage for GeForce 9800 XT and the 5950 Ultra however.
Look back at 2003 graphics card market, we can easily find, and he ATI and NVIDIA in the retail market beginning of a comprehensive confrontation. They have various product lines corresponding products, such as low-end market Radeon 9200 against GeForce FX 5200, in the high-end market against Radeon 9700 Pro GeForce FX 5700 Ultra, a high-end 9800 Pro and XT Radoen against GeForce FX 5900 Ultra and 5950 Ultra.
Although NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950Ultra not by virtue of winning the crown of the King, but the sixth-generation NVIDIA graphics have been ready generation of……
April 21, 2004, NVIDIA in Beijing first to announce their sixth-generation core - NV40. Based on this core NVIDIA cards were divided into four grades, and they are:
GeForce 6800Ultra: a 16 pixel pipelines and six vertex pipelines, the working frequency of 400 MHz/1.1GHz, N card is well-deserved king;
GeForce 6800GT: a 16 pixel pipelines and six vertex pipelines, MHz/1GHz frequency 350, the 6800 Ultra is basically down-version;
GeForce 6800: a 12 pixel pipelines and five vertex pipelines, 325 MHz/700MHz frequency is 6800 series of civilian products;
GeForce 6800LE: The eight pixel pipelines and four vertex pipelines, 300 MHz/700MHz frequency is nVIDIA OEM market for a product.
NVIDIA opponent at this time - ATI, not idle, they are also strained the deployment of a new generation of cards issued to date. Finally, NVIDIA released the sixth generation in the core two weeks after the NV40. That is, for all Chinese people on both memorable May 4, they issued a long-simmering R420 core. However, a total of two products based on the R420 core, they are:
Radeon X800XT PE: Radeon X800XT PE with 16 pipelines, 520 MHz/1.12GHz frequency is at the top ATI graphics processor, and its competitors was designated as the GeForce 6800GT;
Radeon X800Pro: Radeon X800Pro the pipelines for 12, 470 MHz/900MHz frequency, ATI launched targeted at the high-end products, its competitors are located in the GeForce 6800.
NVIDIA and ATI’s next generation of core release, the bugle of the two last confrontation, which is the eighth confrontation sounded. Comparison of firepower from both sides, in ATI’s R480 core release, NVIDIA occupy the absolute superiority. Its 6800 Ultra in 2004, no one could spent most of the enemy.
This situation remains to December, with ATI’s R480 core releases, ATI did not end with NVIDIA GeForce 6800Ultra cards to counter the embarrassment. Based on the R480 core product is now the top ATI graphics - X850XT PE, against its competitors GeForce 6800 Ultra.
Related measure that X850XT PE in performance compared with the GeForce 6800 Ultra, can be said to be well-matched, each have their own advantages. Especially in their respective areas of expertise, performance becomes more apparent. GeForce 6800Ultra in OpenGL performance testing, substantial lead X850XT PE, and in DircetX item test, the situation is exactly the opposite. From this we can be in the table above to see the results.
Therefore, in this time of the confrontation, NVIDIA and ATI seek to benefit no one, which also explains NVIDIA and ATI’s R & D strength has been well-matched, and no one can really beat each other on the significance of their cards on the market "grudge" will also continue, with graphics technology will be their "non-hostilities" forward